Task-focused Workflow

Review FTIR Functional Groups

Inspect functional-group suggestions alongside FTIR band evidence. Use the spectrum and sample context to review assignments in NotyPlot.

NotyPlot: Scientific Plotting & Peak Analysis FTIR functional groups
Start this workflow
InputAn FTIR spectrum and known sample context.
OutputEvidence-linked functional-group suggestions for review.

Workflow

  1. Import and analyze the FTIR spectrum to create a reviewed band list.
  2. Open the functional-group evidence and inspect which measured bands support each suggestion.
  3. Check whether related expected bands are present and whether important contradictory features exist.
  4. Consider overlap, mixtures, baseline artifacts and sample chemistry before accepting a suggestion.
  5. Retain supported interpretations and mark ambiguous cases rather than converting every suggestion into a definitive assignment.
  6. Export or annotate the spectrum with only the assignments needed for the scientific discussion.

What this workflow helps you do

Review possible FTIR functional groups using detected band evidence, not single-peak lookup alone. NotyPlot links suggestions to measured spectral features so you can consider supporting bands, overlaps and sample chemistry before retaining an interpretation.

Use this workflow when

  • Interpreting a reviewed FTIR spectrum after band detection.
  • Checking whether several bands support a proposed functional group.
  • Documenting ambiguous or competing assignments instead of forcing a single answer.

What you need before you start

  • An FTIR spectrum with correctly interpreted signal orientation and wavenumber axis.
  • Reviewed detected bands.
  • Basic sample context such as composition, treatment, expected chemistry or known contaminants.

Step-by-step workflow

  1. Import and analyze the FTIR spectrum to create a reviewed band list.
  2. Open the functional-group evidence and inspect which measured bands support each suggestion.
  3. Check whether related expected bands are present and whether important contradictory features exist.
  4. Consider overlap, mixtures, baseline artifacts and sample chemistry before accepting a suggestion.
  5. Retain supported interpretations and mark ambiguous cases rather than converting every suggestion into a definitive assignment.
  6. Export or annotate the spectrum with only the assignments needed for the scientific discussion.

What to review in the result

  • Assignments are supported by more than an isolated approximate band match when possible.
  • Suggested groups are chemically plausible for the sample.
  • Overlapping ranges and alternative assignments are acknowledged.
  • The final labels remain traceable to measured band evidence.

Before you report or export

  • Use the interpretation as supporting evidence alongside complementary characterization when needed.
  • Report important processing choices and spectrum type.
  • Avoid naming a specific compound from generic functional-group ranges alone.

Limitations and interpretation

  • Functional-group ranges overlap and are not unique fingerprints by themselves.
  • Mixtures, hydrogen bonding and local chemical environment can shift or broaden bands.
  • Knowledge-base suggestions support review; they do not replace reference spectra or expert chemical interpretation.

Continue your work

Start this workflow

This opens NotyPlot: Scientific Plotting & Peak Analysis in Workflow mode. The Tool / Workflow toggle remains available in the toolbar.

Start this workflow